| jeordiara |
Ngày: Thứ hai, 29-04-2013, 11:01 | Message # 1 |
|
Nhóm: Tham dự viên
Bài viết:
|
Appellants in two of the cases before us argue that Florida's statute of repose violates the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment. 10 Appellants contend that the operation of the twelve-year statute of repose, Fla.Stat. § 95.031(2) (1982), together with the four-year statute of limitations, Fla.Stat. § 95.11(3)(e) (1982), creates two classes of injured persons with different legal rights. The first class includes those persons who are injured less than eight years after delivery of the product to its first purchaser and who therefore have the full four years afforded by the statute of limitations to bring their actions. The second class includes those persons who are injured more than eight years but less than twelve years after the product is delivered to its first purchaser. Owing to the operation of the twelve-year statute of repose, persons in the second class have 835 F.2d 1375 less than the full four years afforded those in the first class to file suit. Appellants argue that the statute of repose violates the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment because there is no rational basis for this disparate treatment. learn music reading exercises violin <a href="http://learntoplay-violin.com/">how to learn violin</a> get violin classes in south london
how to play violin spiccato book <a href="http://learntoplay-violin.com/">play a violin</a> best violin classes for children london
free violin instruction book online <a href="http://learntoplay-violin.com/">learn to play the violin</a> violin group classes london online
http://learntoplay-violin.com/ |
| |
| |
